| Ders Adı | Kodu | Yarıyıl | T+U Saat | Kredi | AKTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proxy Warfare İn The Middle East | MES 506 | 0 | 3 + 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Ön Koşul Dersleri | There are no preconditions to take this module. |
| Önerilen Seçmeli Dersler | |
| Dersin Dili | İngilizce |
| Dersin Seviyesi | YUKSEK_LISANS |
| Dersin Türü | Seçmeli |
| Dersin Koordinatörü | Doç.Dr. İBRAHİM AYTAÇ KADIOĞLU |
| Dersi Verenler | Doç.Dr. İBRAHİM AYTAÇ KADIOĞLU, |
| Dersin Yardımcıları | |
| Dersin Kategorisi | Alanına Uygun Öğretim |
| Dersin Amacı | This module aims to describe war, proxy warfare and the proxy-sponsor relationships in the Middle East. It aims to analyse the roots of proxy warfare, cyber and hybrid warfare, and proxy wars in the Middle East in the post-Cold war era. |
| Dersin İçeriği | This module examines an emerging fields of war studies and international security: proxy warfare. The module critically discusses traditional ways of war and how the sovereign states have started to initiate indirect intervention. It explains the proxy-sponsor relationships, the use of non-state armed groups, terrorist organisations and other agents as proxies. It describes the goals and intentions of sponsors and proxy war typologies. |
| Kalkınma Amaçları |
|---|
|
| # | Ders Öğrenme Çıktıları | Öğretim Yöntemleri | Ölçme Yöntemleri |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | To analyse the roots of proxy warfare | Anlatım, Mikro Öğretim, | Doğru Yanlış Testleri, Kısa Cevaplı Testler, |
| 2 | To critically discusses traditional ways of war and how the sovereign states have started to initiate indirect intervention | Soru-Cevap, Beyin Fırtınası, | Boşluk Doldurma Testleri, |
| 3 | To explain the proxy-sponsor relationships | Gösterip Yaptırma, Rol Oynama, Gezi / Gözlem, | Boşluk Doldurma Testleri, |
| Hafta | Ders Konuları | Ön Hazırlık |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 11 | ||
| 12 | ||
| 13 | ||
| 14 |
| Kaynaklar | |
|---|---|
| Ders Notu | Essential Reading o Mumford, A. (2013). Proxy Warfare. Cambridge: Polity. Supplementary Reading o Groh, T. L. (2019). Proxy War: The Least Bad Option. Stanford: Stanford University Press. o Hughes, G. (2012). My Enemy's Enemy: Proxy Warfare in International Politics. Sussex: Sussex Academic Press. |
| Ders Kaynakları | Essential Reading o Mumford, A. (2013). Proxy Warfare. Cambridge: Polity. Supplementary Reading o Groh, T. L. (2019). Proxy War: The Least Bad Option. Stanford: Stanford University Press. o Hughes, G. (2012). My Enemy's Enemy: Proxy Warfare in International Politics. Sussex: Sussex Academic Press. |
| Sıra | Program Çıktıları | Katkı Düzeyi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 1 | Having knowledge and ideas about current issues and problems together with their historical, social, and cultural dimensions. Having advanced knowledge and comprehension in the field of International Relations, supported by the most up-to-date textbooks, practical tools and materials, and other scientific sources, and being able to use them.. | X | |||||
| 2 | Being able to evaluate the concepts, ideas and data of Foreign Policy and International Relations with scientific methods, to identify and analyze complex events, developments and issues, to engage in discussions, and to develop proposals based on facts and research. Being aware of the principles of professional and scientific ethical conduct. | X | |||||
| 3 | Having skills in methods and research techniques in producing and using knowledge, and in accessing information | X | |||||
| 4 | Having the potential and ability to improve oneself in career fields of international relations such as diplomacy and attachéship. | X | |||||
| 5 | Being able to inform interested and uninterested audience groups about topics related to International Relations, and to clearly convey to them one’s thoughts, the problems related to the subject, and the solution methods in written and oral form. Being compatible with teamwork, having initiative, being open to innovative ideas, and being able to think analytically. Using Turkish well, having good written and oral communication skills, being able to express oneself correctly, and having the ability to empathize | X | |||||
| 6 | Reaching information by conducting scientific research, evaluating and interpreting the information together with the expansion and deepening of knowledge in the same or a different field based on the undergraduate qualifications of International Relations, History, Economics, Sociology, and Theology. | X | |||||
| # | Ders Öğrenme Çıktılarının Program Çıktılarına Katkısı | PÇ 1 | PÇ 2 | PÇ 3 | PÇ 4 | PÇ 5 | PÇ 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | To analyse the roots of proxy warfare | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | To critically discusses traditional ways of war and how the sovereign states have started to initiate indirect intervention | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| 3 | To explain the proxy-sponsor relationships | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Değerlendirme Sistemi | |
|---|---|
| Yarıyıl Çalışmaları | Katkı Oranı |
| 1. Ara Sınav | 30 |
| 1. Ödev | 70 |
| Toplam | 100 |
| 1. Yıl İçinin Başarıya | 50 |
| 1. Final | 50 |
| Toplam | 100 |
| AKTS - İş Yükü Etkinlik | Sayı | Süre (Saat) | Toplam İş Yükü (Saat) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ders Süresi (Sınav haftası dahildir: 16x toplam ders saati) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
| Sınıf Dışı Ders Çalışma Süresi(Ön çalışma, pekiştirme) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
| Ara Sınav | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Kısa Sınav | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Final | 1 | 20 | 20 |
| Toplam İş Yükü | 146 | ||
| Toplam İş Yükü / 25 (Saat) | 5,84 | ||
| dersAKTSKredisi | 6 | ||