Ders Adı Kodu Yarıyıl T+U Saat Kredi AKTS
Theorıes Of Internatıonal Relatıons (En) ODC 517 0 3 + 0 3 6
Ön Koşul Dersleri
Önerilen Seçmeli Dersler
Dersin Dili İngilizce
Dersin Seviyesi YUKSEK_LISANS
Dersin Türü Seçmeli
Dersin Koordinatörü Arş.Gör. FURKAN HALİT YOLCU
Dersi Verenler
Dersin Yardımcıları
Dersin Kategorisi Diğer
Dersin Amacı

Ortadoğu Çalışmaları Yüksek Lisans öğrencilerine Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorilerini öğretmek.

Dersin İçeriği

1: General Introduction and information on course requirements
International Relations and Social Science
2: Normative International Relations Theory
3: Classical Realism
4: Structural Realism
5: Liberalism, Neoliberalism
6: The English School
7: Marxism
8: Critical Theory
9: Constructivism
10: Feminism
11: Poststructuralism
12::Postcolonialism
13: Green Theory

# Ders Öğrenme Çıktıları Öğretim Yöntemleri Ölçme Yöntemleri
1 Learns the theories of the IR Anlatım, Soru-Cevap, Tartışma, Sınav , Sözlü Sınav, Ödev,
Hafta Ders Konuları Ön Hazırlık
1 General Introduction and information on course requirements International Relations and Social Science
2 Normative International Relations Theory
3 Classical Realism
4 Structural Realism
5 Liberalism, Neoliberalism
6 The English School
7 Marxism
8 Critical Theory
9 Constructivism
10 Feminism
11 Poststructuralism
12 Postcolonialism
13 Green Theory
14 International Relations Theory and Globalization
Kaynaklar
Ders Notu

• Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith: International Relations Theories, Oxford University Press, 2013.
• Robert Jackson and Georg Sørense: Introduction to International Relations Theories and Approaches, Oxford University Press,2012
• Alexander Wendt. 1992. “Anarchy Is What Stats Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391-425
• Axelrod, Robert (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books, pp. 3-105, 145-91.
• Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia U. Press., chs. 1,2,10.
• Doyle, Michael. 1986. “Liberalism in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1151-69
• Fearon, James (1991). “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, 43 (2), January: 169-95.
• Fearon, James and Alexander Wendt. 2002. “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View,” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, editors, Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 5372
• Finnemore. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell U. Press.
• Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow 1955 and 1999. Cornell U. Press, ch. 1
• Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, 1978.
• John Mearsheimer. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton Company. (TGPP)
• Keohane, Robert and Judith Goldstein (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy, Cornell University Press, chs. 1, 7.
• Keohane, Robert, ed. Neorealism and Its Critics. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), chs. 6,7.
• Krasner, Stephen. 1999 Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. 1-42 and 153-219.
• Lake, David, and Robert Powell, eds. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations (Princeton U. Press), chs by Lake and Powell, Frieden, and Rogowski.
• Lake, David. 1996. “Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations,” International Organization, 50(1).
• Levy, Jack (1992). “Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping Through a Conceptual Minefield” International Organization, 48, 2, Spring, 279-312. (Review)
• Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. NY: Norton. Chapters 1-3.
• Morgenthau, Hans. 1985. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (6th ed.), Knopf, pp. 1-51.
• Powell, Robert. 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1303 – 1320.
• Robert Keohane, ed. 1986. Neo-Realism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press. (NIC)
• Robert Keohane. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (AH)
• Ted Hopf. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23(1): 170-200
• Thucydides. The Peloponnesian War. Book 1, paras 1-23, 66-88, 118-24, 140-46; Book 4, paras 37-51; BookV, Melian dialogue; Book 6, paras 84-116.
• Walt, Stephen 1999. “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies,” International Security, 23, 4, 5-48, and responses in 24, 2, 56-73, 97-106.
• Walt, Stephen. The Origins of Alliances, chs 1,2.
• Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics, chs. 4-8.
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press. Ch.1, 5-8.

Ders Kaynakları

• Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith: International Relations Theories, Oxford University Press, 2013.
• Robert Jackson and Georg Sørense: Introduction to International Relations Theories and Approaches, Oxford University Press,2012
• Alexander Wendt. 1992. “Anarchy Is What Stats Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391-425
• Axelrod, Robert (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books, pp. 3-105, 145-91.
• Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia U. Press., chs. 1,2,10.
• Doyle, Michael. 1986. “Liberalism in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1151-69
• Fearon, James (1991). “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, 43 (2), January: 169-95.
• Fearon, James and Alexander Wendt. 2002. “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View,” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, editors, Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 5372
• Finnemore. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell U. Press.
• Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow 1955 and 1999. Cornell U. Press, ch. 1
• Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, 1978.
• John Mearsheimer. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton Company. (TGPP)
• Keohane, Robert and Judith Goldstein (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy, Cornell University Press, chs. 1, 7.
• Keohane, Robert, ed. Neorealism and Its Critics. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), chs. 6,7.
• Krasner, Stephen. 1999 Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. 1-42 and 153-219.
• Lake, David, and Robert Powell, eds. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations (Princeton U. Press), chs by Lake and Powell, Frieden, and Rogowski.
• Lake, David. 1996. “Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations,” International Organization, 50(1).
• Levy, Jack (1992). “Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping Through a Conceptual Minefield” International Organization, 48, 2, Spring, 279-312. (Review)
• Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. NY: Norton. Chapters 1-3.
• Morgenthau, Hans. 1985. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (6th ed.), Knopf, pp. 1-51.
• Powell, Robert. 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1303 – 1320.
• Robert Keohane, ed. 1986. Neo-Realism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press. (NIC)
• Robert Keohane. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (AH)
• Ted Hopf. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23(1): 170-200
• Thucydides. The Peloponnesian War. Book 1, paras 1-23, 66-88, 118-24, 140-46; Book 4, paras 37-51; BookV, Melian dialogue; Book 6, paras 84-116.
• Walt, Stephen 1999. “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies,” International Security, 23, 4, 5-48, and responses in 24, 2, 56-73, 97-106.
• Walt, Stephen. The Origins of Alliances, chs 1,2.
• Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics, chs. 4-8.
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press. Ch.1, 5-8.

Değerlendirme Sistemi
Yarıyıl Çalışmaları Katkı Oranı
1. Ara Sınav 30
1. Ödev 70
Toplam 100
1. Yıl İçinin Başarıya 50
1. Final 50
Toplam 100
AKTS - İş Yükü Etkinlik Sayı Süre (Saat) Toplam İş Yükü (Saat)
Ders Süresi (Sınav haftası dahildir: 16x toplam ders saati) 16 3 48
Sınıf Dışı Ders Çalışma Süresi(Ön çalışma, pekiştirme) 16 3 48
Ara Sınav 1 20 20
Ödev 1 20 20
Final 1 20 20
Toplam İş Yükü 156
Toplam İş Yükü / 25 (Saat) 6,24
Dersin AKTS Kredisi 6